Manajemen Risiko Rantai Pasok Pengadaan Suku Cadang Pada Perbaikan Alat Berat Melalui Implementasi House Of Risk (HOR)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37385/msej.v6i4.8547Keywords:
Action Research, House Of Risk, Risiko Rantai Pasok, Suku Cadang, Strategi MitigasiAbstract
Rantai pasok pengadaan suku cadang dalam sektor pertambangan memiliki tingkat risiko yang tinggi, yang dapat menyebabkan downtime pada alat berat. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengidentifikasi dan memitigasi risiko tersebut menggunakan metode House of Risk (HOR) dalam dua fase. Pada fase pertama, diidentifikasi 22 agen risiko dan 12 kejadian risiko, dengan agen risiko prioritas berdasarkan nilai Aggregate Risk Potential (ARP) tertinggi meliputi A22, A14, A17, A9, dan A12. Pada fase kedua, disusun 13 strategi mitigasi, dengan lima strategi prioritas yaitu PA1, PA7, PA11, PA10, dan PA9. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah action research yang meliputi siklus identifikasi risiko, validasi oleh ahli, perumusan strategi mitigasi, dan refleksi hasil. Hasil penelitian ini diharapkan dapat meningkatkan efektivitas manajemen risiko dalam rantai pasok suku cadang industri alat berat.
References
probabilities. Wiley.
Azizi, M. Z., Hanoum, S., Purnomo, J. D. T., & Gandolfi, F. (2025). Leveraging digital transformation and absorptive capacity for competitive advantage: Empirical insights from the automotive components sector. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 8(2), 2718-2732
Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2022). Supply chain management: Strategy, planning, and operation (8th ed.). Pearson.
Coyle, J. J., Langley, C. J., Novack, R. A., & Gibson, B. J. (2016). Supply chain management: A logistics perspective. Cengage Learning.
Handfield, R. B., Monczka, R. M., Giunipero, L. C., & Patterson, J. L. (2020). Sourcing and supply chain management (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Hanoum, S. (2021). Manufacturing enterprise performance using network DEA: a profitability and marketability framework. International Journal of Business Excellence, 25(3), 277-299.
Hanoum, S., & Islam, S. M. (2021). Linking performance measurements and manufacturing process improvements: the two-stage analytical framework. International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, 11(4), 542-564.
Heizer, J., Render, B., & Munson, C. (2020). Operations management: Sustainability and supply chain management (13th ed.). Pearson.
Jacobs, F. R., Chase, R. B., & Aquilano, N. J. (2018). Operations and supply management. McGraw-Hill Education.
Knolmayer, G. F., Mertens, P., Zeier, A., & Dickersbach, J. T. (2009). Supply chain management based on SAP systems: Architecture and planning processes. Springer.
Liu, X., Zhang, W., Zhang, D., & Song, Y. (2021). Critical spare parts management in mining: A risk-driven approach. Resources Policy, 72, 102121.
Monczka, R. M., Handfield, R. B., Giunipero, L. C., & Patterson, J. L. (2016). Purchasing and supply chain management (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Montgomery, D. C. (2019). Introduction to statistical quality control (8th ed.). Wiley.
Pujawan, I. N., & Geraldin, L. H. (2009). House of Risk: A model for proactive supply chain risk management. Business Process Management Journal, 15(6), 953–967. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150911003801
Setiawan, B. (2022). Strategi distribusi spareparts untuk efisiensi waktu perbaikan. Jurnal Logistik dan Rantai Pasok, 10(2), 89–97.
Wagner, S. M., & Bode, C. (2009). Dominant risks and risk management practices in supply chains. In G. A. Zsidisin & B. Ritchie (Eds.), Supply chain risk: A handbook of assessment, management, and performance (pp. 271–290). Springer.
Yap, P. (2017). Panduan praktis manajemen risiko perusahaan. Growing Publishing.
Zhang, L., & Chen, Y. (2023). Adaptive spare parts procurement for remote mining sites. Journal of Cleaner Production, 386, 139543.
Template
