Tata Kelola Digital Manajemen Aset, Studi Pada Biro Perencanaan Kejaksaan Agung RI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37385/msej.v6i4.8535Keywords:
Tata Kelola Digital, Inovasi, Manajemen Aset Negara, Kejaksaan Agung RI, Transformasi Birokrasi.Abstract
Transformasi digital dalam pengelolaan Barang Milik Negara (BMN) menjadi imperatif strategis bagi instansi pemerintah untuk menjawab tuntutan akuntabilitas, transparansi, dan efisiensi birokrasi. Penelitian ini menganalisis implementasi Sistem Informasi Manajemen Aset Negara (SIMAN) di Biro Perencanaan Kejaksaan Agung RI, sebagai studi kasus untuk mengevaluasi efektivitas tata kelola digital manajemen aset berbasis Peraturan Menteri Keuangan (PMK) Nomor 118 Tahun 2023. Dengan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif, penelitian ini berfokus pada tiga pilar tata kelola digital strategi, kebijakan, dan standar digital sebagai kerangka teoretis untuk mengidentifikasi kesenjangan antara desain sistem dan realitas implementasi. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa meskipun SIMAN dirancang sebagai platform terpusat untuk mengonsolidasi data aset secara real-time, integrasinya di Kejaksaan Agung menghadapi tantangan multidimensi. Pertama, keragaman BMN (bergerak atau tidak bergerak) dan distribusi geografis yang luas mempersulit harmonisasi data, terutama di daerah terpencil dengan infrastruktur digital terbatas. Kedua, faktor non-teknis seperti resi tensi pegawai terhadap perubahan sistem, ketergantungan pada prosedur manual, dan budaya kerja yang belum sepenuhnya adaptif menjadi penghambat utama. Temuan ini sejalan dengan laporan BPK (2023) yang mengonfirmasi bahwa 68% kendala implementasi SIMAN di instansi pemerintah bersifat non-teknis. Penelitian ini menggarisbawahi perlunya pendekatan holistik dalam tata kelola digital, di mana aspek teknologi harus diimbangi dengan penyelarasan struktur organisasi, peningkatan kompetensi SDM, dan transformasi proses bisnis. Rekomendasi kebijakan mencakup penguatan kapasitas pegawai melalui pelatihan berbasis kasus, revisi SOP yang mengakomodir hybrid system (digital maupun fisik), serta optimasi infrastruktur pendukung di daerah tertinggal. Implikasi teoretis penelitian memperkaya diskusi akademis tentang digitalisasi sektor publik dengan menekankan pentingnya keseimbangan antara inovasi teknologi dan adaptasi sosio-kultural dalam konteks birokrasi Indonesia.
References
L. Welchman, Managing chaos: Digital governance by design. Rosenfeld Media, 2015.
R. Heeks, “Implementing and managing eGovernment: an international text,” 2005.
P. Weill and J. W. Ross, IT governance: How top performers manage IT decision rights for superior results. Harvard Business Press, 2004.
P. J. DiMaggio and W. W. Powell, “The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields,” Am Sociol Rev, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 147–160, 1983.
L. Welchman, Digital Governance: Applying Agile Principles to Adaptive Enterprises. O’Reilly Media, 2015.
S. , et al. Gregor, Resistance to Digital Transformation in Public Sectors: A Institutional Perspective. Government Information Quarterly, 37(4), 101540., 2020.
Y. K. , et al. Dwivedi, “ Achieving Digital Transformation Success Through Alignment: A Literature Review,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 31(3), 101718., 2020.
B. Rothstein and D. Stolle, “The state and social capital: An institutional theory of generalized trust,” Comp Polit, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 441–459, 2008.
F. M. Idzi and R. C. Gomes, “Digital governance: government strategies that impact public services,” Global Public Policy and Governance, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 427–452, 2022.
M. Flyverbom, R. Deibert, and D. Matten, “The governance of digital technology, big data, and the internet: New roles and responsibilities for business,” Bus Soc, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 3–19, 2019.
F. A. Algazo, S. Ibrahim, and W. S. Yusoff, “Digital governance emergence and importance,” Journal of Information System and Technology Management, vol. 6, no. 24, pp. 18–26, 2021.
H. Margetts and P. Dunleavy, “The second wave of digital-era governance: a quasi-paradigm for government on the Web,” Philosophical transactions of the royal society A: mathematical, physical and engineering sciences, vol. 371, no. 1987, p. 20120382, 2013.
N. McBride, “Digital governance challenges in public sector asset management: Infrastructure, innovation, and cybersecurity,” Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 210-219, 2019.
Kaganova and J. Mckellar, Managing Government Property Asset. Washington DC: The Urban Institute Press, 1996.
A. G. Sugiama, Manajemen Aset Pariwisata. Bandung: Guardaya Intimarta, 2013.
Y. Lu, Public Asset Management: Empirical Evidence from the State Goverments in the United States. Florida: Florida Atlantic University, 2011.
R. K. Yin, Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods 6th Edition, Third Edit. London: SAGE Publications, Inc, 2017.
R. K. Yin, Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, 6th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 2018.
J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. United State of America: SAGE Publications, 2022.
J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications, 2023.
Y. S. Lincoln, E. G. Guba, and J. J. Pilotta, “Naturalistic inquiry,” International Journal of Intercultural Relations, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 438–439, 1985, doi: 10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8.
N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, Handbook of Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications, 2019.
N. K. (red. ) Denzin and Y. Lincoln, Handbook of Qualitative Reserch. 2000.
A. Sulistiyo, “Digital Transformation Failures in Indonesian Public Sector,” Universitas Indonesia Press., 2023.
M. Janssen and B. Klievink, “Building Digital Governance Capability,” Public Adm Rev, 2023.
O. Kaganova and R. Nayyar-Stone, Public Asset Management: A Comparative Analysis. World Bank, 2000.
I. , et al Brusca, “Implementing IPSAS in Local Governments,” International Journal of Public Sector Management, 2015.
E. Ostrom, “Governing the Commons,” Cambridge University Press, 2010.
A. B. Sulistiyo, “Membangun Model Manajemen Aset Melalui Antarmuka Pemograman Aplikasi (Aplication Programming Interface) Pada Strategic Business Unit Marine Services BUMN Holding Jasa Survei (IDSURVEY),” 2023.
R. P. Sudirdja, “Pemanfaatan Teknologi Cloud Computing Dalam Reformasi Birokrasi Guna Mewujudkan Kejaksaan Yang Profesional, Komunikatif dan Akuntabel,” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, vol. 50, p. 828, 2019, doi: 10.21143/jhp.vol50.no4.2854.
A. Suryanto, T. Wijaya, and B. Raharjo, “Digitalisasi Birokrasi: Antara Harapan dan Realita ,” urnal Administrasi Publik, 10(2), 145-160, 2022.
M. Janssen and E. Estevez, “Lean government and platform-based governance—Doing more with less,” Gov Inf Q, vol. 30, pp. S1–S8, 2013.
M. T. Ahmad Fauzi and A. H. Rahman, “National asset management system integration in Malaysia: A case study on inter-ministerial data alignment,” Journal of Public Sector Asset Management, 7(2), 89-104, 2021.
I. Mergel, N. Edelmann, and N. Haug, “Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews,” Gov Inf Q, vol. 36, no. 4, p. 101385, 2019.
M. Janssen and E. Estevez, “Lean government and platform-based governance—Doing more with less,” Gov Inf Q, vol. 30, pp. S1–S8, 2013.
M. Kranzberg, “Technology and history:" Kranzberg’s laws",” Technol Cult, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 544–560, 1986.
B. Prasetyo and D. Santoso, “Aligning technical design with operational needs: A study of government information systems failure in Indonesia,” Journal of Public Sector Information Management, 28(4), 321-335, 2022.
S. Brand, How Buildings Learn: What Happens After They’re Built. Penguin Books, 1994.
M. Janssen and E. Estevez, “Lean government and platform-based governance—Doing more with less,” Gov Inf Q, vol. 30, pp. S1–S8, 2013.
A. Cordella and N. Tempini, “E-government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service delivery,” Gov Inf Q, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 279–286, 2015.
S. L. Star and J. R. Griesemer, “Institutional ecology, translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39,” Soc Stud Sci, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 387–420, 1989.
A. Wibowo and T. Suryanto, “Systemic asset duplication in Indonesian public sector: The role of data governance voids,” Indonesian Journal of Public Policy, 15(3), 45-62., 2021.
Template
